Credit default swap

Also, investors can buy and sell protection without owning debt of the reference entity. In other cases, only market makers may bid for bonds. The Ombudsman will listen to your inquiries, complaints, and issues, review the information you provide, and help identify procedures, options, and resources.

Navigation menu

Growth can be based on a variety of factors, such as revenue or earnings growth. Growth funds are typically focused on generating capital gains rather than income. Value can be determined by a variety of measures, including price-to-earnings ratio , price-to-book ratio , or dividend yield. These funds seek to mirror the performance of an index such as the Barclays U.

Aggregate Bond Index or the Barclays U. These funds seek to mimic the performance of a major U. These funds seek to track the performance of a narrow segment of the market such as precious metals. They can also employ a nontraditional investment approach like investing in a fund that tracks both equity and bond indexes. Invest in high-quality, short-term municipal money market securities that are typically exempt from federal income taxes, and in some cases the alternative minimum tax.

Invest in high-quality, short-term municipal money market securities that are typically exempt from federal income taxes and may be exempt from state income taxes depending on your state of residence.

Treasury and government money market funds. Companies in the Consumer Discretionary sector manufacture goods or provide services that people want but, don't necessarily need, such as high-definition televisions, new cars, and family vacations. Learn about consumer discretionary funds. The Consumer Staples sector consists of companies that provide goods and services that people use on a daily basis, like food, clothing, or other personal products.

Learn about consumer staples funds. The Energy sector consists of companies involved in the exploration, production, or management of energy resources such as oil, gas, and coal, as well as companies that service these industries. Learn more about energy funds. Companies in the Financials sector are engaged in businesses such as banking and brokerage, mortgage finance, insurance, or real estate development.

Learn more about financials funds. The Health Care sector includes companies engaged in the production and delivery of medicine and health care—related goods and services. Learn more about health care funds. The Industrials sector includes companies that manufacture and distribute capital goods in support of industries such as aerospace and defense, construction and engineering, and electrical equipment and heavy machinery.

Learn more about industrial funds. The Information Technology sector comprises companies that are engaged in the creation, storage, and exchange of digital information. Learn more about information technology funds. The Materials sector consists of companies that are engaged in the manufacturing or processing of chemicals and plastics, the harvesting of forests, or the extraction of metals and minerals.

Learn more about materials funds. Real estate exposure can be obtained through a variety of different types of securities, including common stocks, bonds, preferred stocks, and securities of real estate investment trusts REITs and commercial mortgage backed securities CMBs. Learn more about real estate funds.

Companies in the Telecommunications sector provide traditional fixed-line telephone, wireless, and data services. These companies can also be engaged in the designing, building, and servicing of communications devices and networks.

Learn more about telecommunications funds. The Utilities sector includes companies that engage in the production and delivery of electric power, natural gas, water, and other utility services, such as steam and cooled air.

Learn more about utilities funds. Skip to Main Content. Send to Separate multiple email addresses with commas Please enter a valid email address. Your email address Please enter a valid email address. Benefits of domestic equity funds Exposure to successful, innovative, and profitable companies May offer significant appreciation potential A good foundation for almost any portfolio for risk-tolerant investors.

Our portfolio managers see reasons tech may continue outperforming the market. Looking for opportunities now Here's what our managers are uncovering in some overlooked corners of the market.

Benefits of international equity funds More than half the world's companies reside outside the U. Tap into the growth potential in other parts of the world. Lower the volatility of your profile through diversification. The market may be underestimating the number of rate hikes ahead in this cycle. It's EM crunch time The Fed has quelled emerging markets turmoil before but it may not this time. Investing internationally See how your investment mix could benefit by adding some global flavor.

Benefits of sector funds Tactical investment approaches, such as sector rotation strategies More precise asset allocation Greater diversification of your portfolio. Channel trading Have stocks broken out of their range to reach near all-time highs? Tilted toward tech Tech, energy, and consumer discretionary score most positive marks. Benefits of fixed income funds Potential for capital preservation, depending on the fund Income generation Liquidity.

Debt obligations issued by states, cities, counties, and other public entities that use the loans to fund public projects, such as the construction of schools, hospitals, highways, sewers, and universities. Fully taxable debt obligations issued by corporations that fund capital improvements, expansions, debt refinancing, or acquisitions that require more capital than would ordinarily be available from a single lender. Debt securities rated below investment grade 2 based on the issuer's weaker ability to pay interest and capital, resulting in the issuer paying a higher rate to entice investors to take on the added risk.

Fidelity offers investors the opportunity to participate in both the new issue and secondary bond markets. Investors pay no commissions or concessions when participating in new issue offerings, but Fidelity charges a mark-up for buys or mark-down for sells in the secondary market.

Accessibility of new issues varies for individual investors, with the Treasury market most accessible and the corporate market least accessible. The secondary market is composed of bonds that were issued in the past and may be traded until redeemed by the issuer. Unlike equity markets where the universe of approximately 5, securities is available to trade at all times within market hours, the U. The composition of this offered subset also varies from day to day. Fidelity makes it easy for you to view and select from our large inventory of new issue and secondary market bonds and CDs to meet your needs.

Bond outlook for View all retirement articles. Skip to Main Content. Intercontinental said in the statement today that all market participants such as hedge funds, banks or other institutions are open to become members of the clearinghouse as long as they meet these requirements.

A clearinghouse acts as the buyer to every seller and seller to every buyer, reducing the risk of counterparty defaulting on a transaction. In the over-the-counter market, where credit- default swaps are currently traded, participants are exposed to each other in case of a default. In April , hedge fund insiders became aware that the market in credit default swaps was possibly being affected by the activities of Bruno Iksil , a trader for J. Heavy opposing bets to his positions are known to have been made by traders, including another branch of J.

Morgan, who purchased the derivatives offered by J. Morgan in such high volume. The disclosure, which resulted in headlines in the media, did not disclose the exact nature of the trading involved, which remains in progress. A CDS contract is typically documented under a confirmation referencing the credit derivatives definitions as published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.

The period over which default protection extends is defined by the contract effective date and scheduled termination date. The confirmation also specifies a calculation agent who is responsible for making determinations as to successors and substitute reference obligations for example necessary if the original reference obligation was a loan that is repaid before the expiry of the contract , and for performing various calculation and administrative functions in connection with the transaction.

By market convention, in contracts between CDS dealers and end-users, the dealer is generally the calculation agent, and in contracts between CDS dealers, the protection seller is generally the calculation agent. It is not the responsibility of the calculation agent to determine whether or not a credit event has occurred but rather a matter of fact that, pursuant to the terms of typical contracts, must be supported by publicly available information delivered along with a credit event notice.

Typical CDS contracts do not provide an internal mechanism for challenging the occurrence or non-occurrence of a credit event and rather leave the matter to the courts if necessary, though actual instances of specific events being disputed are relatively rare.

CDS confirmations also specify the credit events that will give rise to payment obligations by the protection seller and delivery obligations by the protection buyer.

Typical credit events include bankruptcy with respect to the reference entity and failure to pay with respect to its direct or guaranteed bond or loan debt. CDS written on North American investment grade corporate reference entities, European corporate reference entities and sovereigns generally also include restructuring as a credit event, whereas trades referencing North American high-yield corporate reference entities typically do not.

Finally, standard CDS contracts specify deliverable obligation characteristics that limit the range of obligations that a protection buyer may deliver upon a credit event. Trading conventions for deliverable obligation characteristics vary for different markets and CDS contract types. Typical limitations include that deliverable debt be a bond or loan, that it have a maximum maturity of 30 years, that it not be subordinated, that it not be subject to transfer restrictions other than Rule A , that it be of a standard currency and that it not be subject to some contingency before becoming due.

The premium payments are generally quarterly, with maturity dates and likewise premium payment dates falling on March 20, June 20, September 20, and December The European sovereign debt crisis resulted from a combination of complex factors, including the globalisation of finance ; easy credit conditions during the — period that encouraged high-risk lending and borrowing practices; the — global financial crisis ; international trade imbalances; real-estate bubbles that have since burst; the — global recession ; fiscal policy choices related to government revenues and expenses; and approaches used by nations to bail out troubled banking industries and private bondholders, assuming private debt burdens or socialising losses.

The Credit default swap market also reveals the beginning of the sovereign crisis. The definition of restructuring is quite technical but is essentially intended to respond to circumstances where a reference entity, as a result of the deterioration of its credit, negotiates changes in the terms in its debt with its creditors as an alternative to formal insolvency proceedings i.

During the Greek sovereign debt crisis, one important issue was whether the restructuring would trigger Credit default swap CDS payments. European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund negotiators avoided these triggers as they could have jeopardized the stability of major European banks who had been protection writers.

An alternative could have been to create new CDS which clearly would pay in the event of debt restructuring. The market would have paid the spread between these and old potentially more ambiguous CDS. This practice is far more typical in jurisdictions that do not provide protective status to insolvent debtors similar to that provided by Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

In particular, concerns arising out of Conseco 's restructuring in led to the credit event's removal from North American high yield trades. As described in an earlier section, if a credit event occurs then CDS contracts can either be physically settled or cash settled. The development and growth of the CDS market has meant that on many companies there is now a much larger outstanding notional of CDS contracts than the outstanding notional value of its debt obligations.

This is because many parties made CDS contracts for speculative purposes, without actually owning any debt that they wanted to insure against default. The trade confirmation produced when a CDS is traded states whether the contract is to be physically or cash settled.

When a credit event occurs on a major company on which a lot of CDS contracts are written, an auction also known as a credit-fixing event may be held to facilitate settlement of a large number of contracts at once, at a fixed cash settlement price. During the auction process participating dealers e. A second stage Dutch auction is held following the publication of the initial midpoint of the dealer markets and what is the net open interest to deliver or be delivered actual bonds or loans.

The final clearing point of this auction sets the final price for cash settlement of all CDS contracts and all physical settlement requests as well as matched limit offers resulting from the auction are actually settled. According to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association ISDA , who organised them, auctions have recently proved an effective way of settling the very large volume of outstanding CDS contracts written on companies such as Lehman Brothers and Washington Mutual.

Below is a list of the auctions that have been held since There are two competing theories usually advanced for the pricing of credit default swaps. The first, referred to herein as the 'probability model', takes the present value of a series of cashflows weighted by their probability of non-default. This method suggests that credit default swaps should trade at a considerably lower spread than corporate bonds. Under the probability model, a credit default swap is priced using a model that takes four inputs; this is similar to the rNPV risk-adjusted NPV model used in drug development:.

If default events never occurred the price of a CDS would simply be the sum of the discounted premium payments. So CDS pricing models have to take into account the possibility of a default occurring some time between the effective date and maturity date of the CDS contract.

If we assume for simplicity that defaults can only occur on one of the payment dates then there are five ways the contract could end:. To price the CDS we now need to assign probabilities to the five possible outcomes, then calculate the present value of the payoff for each outcome.

The present value of the CDS is then simply the present value of the five payoffs multiplied by their probability of occurring. At either side of the diagram are the cashflows up to that point in time with premium payments in blue and default payments in red. If the contract is terminated the square is shown with solid shading. The riskier the reference entity the greater the spread and the more rapidly the survival probability decays with time.

To get the total present value of the credit default swap we multiply the probability of each outcome by its present value to give. In the "no-arbitrage" model proposed by both Duffie, and Hull-White, it is assumed that there is no risk free arbitrage.

Both analyses make simplifying assumptions such as the assumption that there is zero cost of unwinding the fixed leg of the swap on default , which may invalidate the no-arbitrage assumption. However the Duffie approach is frequently used by the market to determine theoretical prices. Under the Duffie construct, the price of a credit default swap can also be derived by calculating the asset swap spread of a bond. If a bond has a spread of , and the swap spread is 70 basis points, then a CDS contract should trade at However, there are sometimes technical reasons why this will not be the case, and this may or may not present an arbitrage opportunity for the canny investor.

The difference between the theoretical model and the actual price of a credit default swap is known as the basis. Critics of the huge credit default swap market have claimed that it has been allowed to become too large without proper regulation and that, because all contracts are privately negotiated, the market has no transparency.

Furthermore, there have been claims that CDSs exacerbated the global financial crisis by hastening the demise of companies such as Lehman Brothers and AIG. In the case of Lehman Brothers, it is claimed that the widening of the bank's CDS spread reduced confidence in the bank and ultimately gave it further problems that it was not able to overcome.

However, proponents of the CDS market argue that this confuses cause and effect; CDS spreads simply reflected the reality that the company was in serious trouble. Furthermore, they claim that the CDS market allowed investors who had counterparty risk with Lehman Brothers to reduce their exposure in the case of their default.

Credit default swaps have also faced criticism that they contributed to a breakdown in negotiations during the General Motors Chapter 11 reorganization , because certain bondholders might benefit from the credit event of a GM bankruptcy due to their holding of CDSs. Critics speculate that these creditors had an incentive to push for the company to enter bankruptcy protection.

Furthermore, CDS deals are marked-to-market frequently. This would have led to margin calls from buyers to sellers as Lehman's CDS spread widened, reducing the net cashflows on the days after the auction.

Senior bankers have argued that not only has the CDS market functioned remarkably well during the financial crisis; that CDS contracts have been acting to distribute risk just as was intended; and that it is not CDSs themselves that need further regulation but the parties who trade them. Some general criticism of financial derivatives is also relevant to credit derivatives.

Warren Buffett famously described derivatives bought speculatively as "financial weapons of mass destruction. In the meantime, though, before a contract is settled, the counterparties record profits and losses—often huge in amount—in their current earnings statements without so much as a penny changing hands. The range of derivatives contracts is limited only by the imagination of man or sometimes, so it seems, madmen.

To hedge the counterparty risk of entering a CDS transaction, one practice is to buy CDS protection on one's counterparty. The positions are marked-to-market daily and collateral pass from buyer to seller or vice versa to protect both parties against counterparty default, but money does not always change hands due to the offset of gains and losses by those who had both bought and sold protection.

The monoline insurance companies got involved with writing credit default swaps on mortgage-backed CDOs. Some media reports have claimed this was a contributing factor to the downfall of some of the monolines. During the financial crisis , counterparties became subject to a risk of default, amplified with the involvement of Lehman Brothers and AIG in a very large number of CDS transactions.

This is an example of systemic risk , risk which threatens an entire market, and a number of commentators have argued that size and deregulation of the CDS market have increased this risk. For example, imagine if a hypothetical mutual fund had bought some Washington Mutual corporate bonds in and decided to hedge their exposure by buying CDS protection from Lehman Brothers. After Lehman's default, this protection was no longer active, and Washington Mutual's sudden default only days later would have led to a massive loss on the bonds, a loss that should have been insured by the CDS.

Chains of CDS transactions can arise from a practice known as "netting". However, if the reference company defaults, company B might not have the assets on hand to make good on the contract. It depends on its contract with company A to provide a large payout, which it then passes along to company C.

The problem lies if one of the companies in the chain fails, creating a " domino effect " of losses. For example, if company A fails, company B will default on its CDS contract to company C, possibly resulting in bankruptcy, and company C will potentially experience a large loss due to the failure to receive compensation for the bad debt it held from the reference company.

Even worse, because CDS contracts are private, company C will not know that its fate is tied to company A; it is only doing business with company B.

As described above , the establishment of a central exchange or clearing house for CDS trades would help to solve the "domino effect" problem, since it would mean that all trades faced a central counterparty guaranteed by a consortium of dealers. There is a risk of having CDS recharacterized as different types of financial instruments because they resemble put options and credit guarantees. If a CDS is a notional principal contract, pre-default periodic and nonperiodic payments on the swap are deductible and included in ordinary income.

The thrust of this criticism is that Naked CDS are indistinguishable from gambling wagers, and thus give rise in all instances to ordinary income, including to hedge fund managers on their so-called carried interests, [] and that the IRS exceeded its authority with the proposed regulations. The accounting treatment of CDS used for hedging may not parallel the economic effects and instead, increase volatility.

In contrast, assets that are held for investment, such as a commercial loan or bonds, are reported at cost, unless a probable and significant loss is expected. Thus, hedging a commercial loan using a CDS can induce considerable volatility into the income statement and balance sheet as the CDS changes value over its life due to market conditions and due to the tendency for shorter dated CDS to sell at lower prices than longer dated CDS.

One can try to account for the CDS as a hedge under FASB [] but in practice that can prove very difficult unless the risky asset owned by the bank or corporation is exactly the same as the Reference Obligation used for the particular CDS that was bought. A new type of default swap is the "loan only" credit default swap LCDS. This is conceptually very similar to a standard CDS, but unlike "vanilla" CDS, the underlying protection is sold on syndicated secured loans of the Reference Entity rather than the broader category of "Bond or Loan".

Also, as of May 22, , for the most widely traded LCDS form, which governs North American single name and index trades, the default settlement method for LCDS shifted to auction settlement rather than physical settlement. The auction method is essentially the same that has been used in the various ISDA cash settlement auction protocols, but does not require parties to take any additional steps following a credit event i. Because LCDS trades are linked to secured obligations with much higher recovery values than the unsecured bond obligations that are typically assumed the cheapest to deliver in respect of vanilla CDS, LCDS spreads are generally much tighter than CDS trades on the same name.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Buyer purchased a CDS at time t 0 and makes regular premium payments at times t 1 , t 2 , t 3 , and t 4. If the associated credit instrument suffers no credit event, then the buyer continues paying premiums at t 5 , t 6 and so on until the end of the contract at time t n. However, if the associated credit instrument suffered a credit event at t 5 , then the seller pays the buyer for the loss, and the buyer would cease paying premiums to the seller.

Parts of this article those related to legality of naked CDS in Europe need to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. Causes of the European sovereign-debt crisis. Retrieved 31 January Why do they exist? Retrieved January 5, Archived from the original PDF on March 23, Retrieved April 8, Retrieved March 12, Retrieved April 25, Heading towards a more stable system" PDF. Retrieved April 15, Securities and Exchange Commission.

Retrieved April 2, University of Cincinnati Law Review. Archived from the original on April 29, Retrieved April 22, Retrieved 1 November Retrieved 13 January